Pages
- Home
- ગુજરાતી
- हीन्दी
- संस्कृत
- English
- ગણિત
- વિજ્ઞાન
- સામાજિક વિજ્ઞાન
- Site Map
- M-Learning/ટેબ્લેટ દ્રારા શિક્ષણ
- Online & OfflineTest/E-Test
- Blog Guru
- ppt
- એકમ કસોટી
- MP3
- CCC
- Competitive Exam Material
- Gunotsav Material
- Be Smart In English Video
- ધોરણ 6 English
- ધોરણ 7 English
- ધોરણ 8 English
- English Quiz Games
Showing posts with label Poetry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Poetry. Show all posts
Sunday, February 16, 2014
Thursday, February 13, 2014
Critical Appreciate of the poem "Bring me Sunset in a Cup" written by Emily Dickinson
Emily Dickinson-a great American female poet represented
the farthest point in the 19th century American Poetry. American
poetry in regard to the adventures of the spirit is beautifully reflected in
her poetry. She had the distinction of being a pioneer of 19th
century American Poetry. She was an anticipator of metaphysical poetry, a
smeller of modernity and a defender of romanticism. Conard Alken
described her as,
Critical Appreciate of the poem “I taste a Liquor Never Brewed” written by Emily Dickinson
Emily Dickinson-a great American female poet represented
the farthest point in the 19th century American Poetry. American
poetry in regard to the adventures of the spirit is beautifully reflected in
her poetry. She had the distinction of being a pioneer of 19th
century American Poetry. She was an anticipator of metaphysical poetry, a
smeller of modernity and a defender of romanticism. Conard Alken described
her as,
Critical Appreciate of the poem " I am Nobody! Who are you?" written by Emily Dickinson
Emily
Dickinson-a great American female poet
represented the farthest point in the 19th century American Poetry.
American poetry in regard to the adventures of the spirit is beautifully
reflected in her poetry. She had the distinction of being a pioneer of 19th
century American Poetry. She was an anticipator of metaphysical poetry, a
smeller of modernity and a defender of romanticism. Conard Alken
described her as,
Critically appreciate Because I Could not Stop for Death by Emily Dickinson
Emily Dickinson-a great American female poet represented the farthest
point in the 19th century American Poetry. American poetry in regard
to the adventures of the spirit is beautifully reflected in her poetry. She had
the distinction of being a pioneer of 19th century American Poetry.
She was an anticipator of metaphysical poetry, a smeller of modernity and a
defender of romanticism. Conard Alken described her as,
Appreciate “Success is counted sweetest” as a definition poem of Emily Dickinson
Emily Dickinson-a great American female poet represented the farthest
point in the 19th century American Poetry. American poetry in regard
to the adventures of the spirit is beautifully reflected in her poetry. She had
the distinction of being a pioneer of 19th century American Poetry.
She was an anticipator of metaphysical poetry, a smeller of modernity and a defender
of romanticism. Conard Alken described her as,
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Critically evaluate The Soldier–Rupert Brooke
Rupert
Brooke, a War poet, had taken in the First World War and died in 1950 at the
age of 32. His war experiences and deep love for the country made his poem and
himself very popular. According to A. C. Ward, “In a group of sonnets he evoked
the patriotism and idealism of that strange and tragic year of 1814.”
Critically evaluate The Wild Swan- W.B. Yeats
William Butler Yeats was the most famous Irish metaphysical poet and a
great Irish dramatist. As supreme symbolist, He was the father of the
symbolistic movement. He was a Noble Prize Winner in 1923, composed some of the
most respected poetry of 20th century. Like T.S. Eliot, he was the
initiator of the 20th century poetry.
Critically evaluate The poemBreak, Break, Break–Tennyson
Lord
Alfred Tennyson was the most popular poets of the English Victorian Ages.
His poetry was read in all cultured households; he was made Poet Laureate and
was buried in Westminster Abbey. His poetry was an epitome of his time. According
to W. J. Long “Through the entire Victorian period Tennyson stood of the summit
of the poetry in England”
Critically evaluate the poem Lucy– William Wordsworth
William Wordsworth was poet of nature
and one of pioneers of the Romantic Movement in England. He had brought in a
new trend in poetry-stressing the need for a return to nature and simple mode
of poetic communication. He had an
exceptional influence on the development of English literature.
Critically evaluate the poem If–Rudyard Kipling (1856-1936)
Poetry
is one of the oldest arts. It has twin functions, ‘to please and to teach to
reader’. Sometime it gives pleasing
and something it gives teaching through pleasing. The poem ‘If’ is the best
examples of this type of poetry. It is written by Rudyard Kipling. He was a very famous poet of early part of the
twentieth century and was awarded Noble prize in 1907.
Critically appreciate ‘Lakshman.’
Lakshman: Historical religious
character:-
Lakshman is a historical character. He
was a prince of king Dashrath. In the great epic, ‘The Ramayana’ he is almost a
shadow of Lord Rama. He is known for his brotherly love, faith and bravely.
Toru Dutt was fascinated to ancient
mythical stories. Her one collection refers the same. Many of her poems have
issues or themes from the history. So Lakshman isn’t new for us but Toru’s
poetic art is our concern. She narrates as she found him.
Faith and Helplessness of Lakshman; theme:-
Lakshman is a great example of faith.
In the forest he wanders with Rama and Sita. In a situation Rama goes for
hunting on demand of Sita, he asks Lakshman to guard her at any coast. While he
was guarding her, Sita heard a cry and believes it is her husbands shouting for
help. She asks Lakshman to go and save but he denies and tells that his brother
can not be defeated or killed so easily. It could be a mistake. At this time
Sita becomes so angry that she tells a lot to Lakshman. For him on one side
obedience to his brother is there and o the other Sita’s taunts and bitter
remarks make him helpless. Lakshman’s helplessness is brought out by the poet.
Rama’s going away:-
The poem begins with the conversation
between and Sita and Lakshman. Rama had gone to hunt a deer. The deer was so
beautiful that Sita demanded it to bring her. Actually it wasn’t a deer but a
form of Maricha. To take revenge on Rama for his sister’s insult, Ravana had
planned this. Rama goes to hunt the deer which is actually Maricha. Ravana
comes to the hut where Sita is left behind. Maricha makes foul cry in the
similar voice of Rama, so than Lakshman goes away and Sita be left alone.
Ravana would take her away. Accordingly it happens.
Maricha begins to roar piercing cries:
“Oh Sita, “Oh Lakshman”. Sita hears the cry and requests Lakshman to go swiftly
and save his brother. Sita thinks that her husband is terribly hurt by enemies
and that is why he is making terrible cries. Lakshman has many arguments
favoring Rama but she doesn’t listen to any. She becomes angry and scolds him
for his inaction.
Swift in decision, prompt in deed
Brave unto rashness can this be
The man, to whom all looked at need
Is it my brother that I see!
Lakshman speaks highly of Rama’s
courage and asks to dispel her all fears. HE tells her that demons, ghosts and
gods are equally afraid of his might. This can not bee his cry. It is certainly
a plan of foe. But Sita blames him on different grounds, including cowardice.
She tells him of having malice of in him. He has something different in this
mind. He himself wants to remove his brother so that he can take away his wife
and kingdom. She insults him with these words:-
“Learn this,
-whatever comes may come,
But I shall not survive my Love-
Of all my thoughts here is the sum!
Witness it gods in heaven above.”
Lakshman
is unable to bear it any longer her taunts. He asks her to hear him before he
goes. He says that she has misunderstood him and cruelly wrongs him. He also
says that in her grief she has also forgotten her decorum. He says if he goes
away he would break his brother’s order. Moreover he doesn’t consider him as
the brother only but as the chief. It is a crime to disregard or disobey. To
follow it be faithfully is his sole responsibility. Yet he is ready to break
the rule for her sake and tells her he would be responsible in such a case for
any mishap. Before he goes he draws a
magic circle on the ground him his arrow, asking her not to go beyond it, lest
she should come to harm. He acquits her of all blame and invokes a blessing on
her. He departs and is confident of speedy return of himself and of his
brother. His departure is attended by ill- omens. The end of the poem suggests
what is to be followed.
Lakshman- Heroic & Sita- common Woman:-
If we read the Ramayana we find these
characters completely different. Lakshman is almost same but we have to take note
that he is also similar to common man. His language is not suitable to his
structure. Toru wants bring the same Lakshman but he isn’t so and we have to
assume him so. As the human being Toru’s idea is to bring pathetic condition
and inner thoughts of Lakshman which is new and the poet should be
congratulated for the same. Sita is not the Ramayana’s Sita but she is a common
woman. She becomes angry, taunts Lakshman and accuses him wrongly. Slowly Sita
is becoming like a common woman- the transformation of her is an interesting
aspect of the poem. The opening brings her anxiety. Lakshman’s stand and justification, his
determination and faith make him more likeable than Sita. Her feminine weapon
of bitter sarcasm makes her mean.
A narrative poem: Ballad:-
Lakshman is a narrative poem. It tells
us a story of the heroic character Lakshman. Sita also comes in the picture.
Rama remains at the background. Even thought it is a known tale, Toru attempts
it to create poetry. The following aspects make the poem as the narrative one.
(a) Narrative dialogues:-
Mostly the poet describes the
character, event or action. Toru does both narration and dialogue. Major part
is a dialogue between the main character Lakshman and Sita. These aspects give
liveliness and directness. e.g.
“Hark! Lakshman! Hark, again that cry?
It is – it is my husband’s voice…”
“He said and straight him weapons took
His bow and arrows pointed keen…”
“We part as friends- is it not so?
And speaking thus-he sadly smiles!”
Regarding Rama’s might the poet has
described some beautiful stanzas. They show words are flowing and she is able
to put down on paper.
(b) Simplicity of Diction:-
As the poem is a narrative one, simple
language is suitable. This is not epic. Simple sentences, simple questions and
direst understanding give it simplicity. The following lines prove the point.
Þ He calls on the
Þ I can not bear suspense
Þ He has a work- he can not die
Þ Art thou a coward?
Þ I did not know thy mind before.
(C)Abruptness:-
The poem begins quickly. As we read we
come into reference and context. Things become clear then. The poem also ends
dramatically. We have been left to find what happened to Sita. This is done to
engage the readers into the poem. As we are aware of the epic we know that
happened to Sita. Dialogues are dramatic. These things are helpful to raise the
poem at the level of a heroic poem.
(D) Repetitions:-
Words, lines, phrases are often
repeated. They create a peculiar style as well as rhythm. They intensify the
meaning and serious shades.
Hark! Lakshman! Hark…
That cry – that cry, it seems to …
In the stanza the possessive pronoun
‘his’ has often been used: “His hope’, ‘his ignoble foes’, ‘his banishment’,
‘his death’. Etc. Similarly ‘I’, ‘me’, ‘you’, ‘your’ etc are also found many
times. Nouns are also repeated as there are dialogues.
(E) Rhythm:-
The poem follows a bit fast rhythm as
there’s such a mood. Dialogues in critical condition show that Lakshman and Sita
are important. Quickly the lines change. Words flow quickly as well.
“Rakshasas, Danavas, demons, ghosts
Acknowledge in their hearts his might
And sink to their remotest coasts
In terror at his very sight.
How swiftly, easily these lines run!
And these are plenty of such examples.
(F) Clauses and phrases:-
The poet has descriptive power. She
uses clauses and phrases to build the atmosphere and rhythm e.g.
Swift in decision, prompt in deed
Brave unto rashness can this be
The man, to whom all looked at need
Is it my brother that I see!
Most of the stanzas have such kind a
combination. Because of this the poem becomes heroic poem.
Critically appreciate the poem ‘Or Casuarina Tree’
Our
Casuarina Tree – Toru Dutt
Tree; Symbol:-
The tree symbolizes the pot’s feeling.
Her childhood is associated with a Casuarina tree, which was standing in her
garden. She grows up and goes away but tree remains in her memory.
The poem is
a ‘meeting point for the past and the present for time and eternity. This is
the theme symbolically presented in another words. It is an admirable blend of
local touches and literary reminiscences or objective description of the actual
tree and the charm of association with Toru’s Childhood.
The Tree:-
The poem is addressed to the tree. It
is praised and remembered almost like a hymn. The poem opens with an account of
the giant tree. Casuarina is a commonly found tree in Bengal.
It grows crimson flowers. The Casuarina tree of Toru is very big and great
creeper’s embrace but this tree is bold enough to stand. Crimson flowers are
hung. The tree remains very busy during the day. Day and night it is a centre
of busy life. Birds and bees are gathered. At night sweet songs of darkening
could be heard. His puny also leaps about. Kokilas hail the day. Cows would
pass from the shadow of the tree. In the early sunlight the shadow enmasses (covers)
beautiful water lilies. They turn as if snow has covered them.
The tree and dear memories:-
Because it is splendid, the poet
doesn’t love the tree but because her childhood memories are associated. Years
may pass but when they were young and played under this tree has remained
still. It is sweeter because her companions also played under it. Remembering
those days, she becomes sad, even cheeks turn wet because of tears. The tree
seems to be weeping as well. As if it is shading trees and wailing. It becomes spirited
(unnatural). It turns horrible. The un-nerving and unusual feeling of the poet
suggests some things supernatural. It is an effort of the poet perhaps that
through the tree she wants to find sympathy. She imagines pain and pity may
reach to unknown land. Toru had lost her brother and sister very early so their
memories are referred here. Look how beautiful she puts these feelings : -
“O sweet companions, loved with love
intense,
For your sakes shall the tree be ever
dear!”
“The unknown land’ refers her going
abroad even when she was traveling in France or Italy, it had always sent
thought winging its way homeward, and bringing recollections of the tree which
was so dearly loved in childhood.
Humanization of the Tree:-
As we saw above, the tree assumes a
human form. It feels and speaks. It has pain and pleasure. In absence of Toru’s
companion the also becomes awful and ghostly. Often she remembers this tree
even when the tree is absent. The tree evokes feelings in her in moonlight. It
would be like a dream. Her inner eyes find its picture. It is the visualization
of the tee. The tree becomes sublime form. It would be same as she had seen in
her childhood days and
-Mine inner vision rose a form
sublime,
Thy form, O Tree as in my happy prime
I saw thee, in my own loved native clime.”
Thus tree does not remain an object
but a living friend.
Wish of immortalizing the tree:-
The place where the tree stands, she
wishes she would declare it holy place. It was loved by many who have now
sleepy in the graves. They had also played here. Because of them, too the tree
is dearer than life. That’s why the tree should live or remain forever. She
wishes ‘deathless’ to it. “Fear, trembling hope, and death and the skeleton and
time of shadow” may linger under its shadow but it shouldn’t see death. Her
verse may not be able to sing well its praises yet the happiness should come.
There is curse of death (Oblivion) but love (poet’s) would defend it.
“The last stanza of the poem, with its
right romantic fervor, unfolds a desire of the poetess for the immortality or
verse, and ends with the delightful line :May love defend thee from oblivion’s
curse.”
Rich Imagery:-
The poem is very rich for its imagery.
The image of the tree creates tenderness and pathos. It evokes these feelings.
The tree almost becomes a loveable, kind human form. The first stanza describes
it gigantic for and brings before use its value. The birds, cows, baboons and
bees continuously haunt this tree. Children played beneath it. This all give a
visual image of the tree. Even in the distant land this form rises in the
vision. Images of her:. “Playing with brother and sister also come. They create
sad feelings. Tragic beauty takes place. Loneliness and dirge mixed together make
an unnerving nerving effect.
Description, metaphor and similes
shape rich texture of the poem.
Metaphor:-
The tree and related images have
becomes sweet because of metaphors. e.g. “the giant wears the scarf” the giant relates
to the tree. Song is sweet. Eyes are a casement, and are delighted as well. The
garden overflows with one sweet song. For her parted brother and sister she
used ‘sweet companions’. Other metaphors: ‘a sheltered boy’, ‘classic shore’,
blessed sleep’, ‘deathless tree’, ‘trembling Hope’, ‘weak verse’ assimilate in
the structure. They show the poet’s genius and creativity.
Similes:-
Very opening line suggests a simile. A
creeper is “like a huge python”. She is hearing a sad song which is ‘dirge-like
murmur’. She visualizes the form of tree ‘as in my happy prime I saw thee’. Her
wish to immortalize the tree is also “like those in Borrow dale”. The similes
are few but capable enough to show her poetic art.
Phrases and clause:-
The poem has a fine description. There
is deep feeling which flows swiftly. Naturally there are many phrases and
clauses which strengthen the argument. e.g.
“Like a huge python, winding round and
round,
The rugged trunk, indented deep with
scars
Up to its very summit hear the stars.
In just three limes how many phrases!
The stanza is carried on and there a clause joined with it.
“… in whose embrace bound
No other tree could live.”
Other some clauses are: “While on
lower bough/his puny…”, “though years may roll…” , “till the hot tears blind”,
“when earth lay tranced…” etc/
These phrases and clauses are joined
by many ways. Conjunction, commas, dash, semicolons has been used and because
of this long description take place. Notice the following lines with underlined
words.
“And far and near Kokilas hail the day;
And to their pastures wend our sleepy cows,
And in the shadow, on the broad tank cast;
By that hoar tree, so beautiful and vast.”
To change the ideas or mood
punctuations have been used. They have served well.
Archaic words:-
The tree is romanticized. Old language
would better suit. Toru knew this and that’s why she used archaic words. Mostly
they are related to pronouns. The last stanza is particularly seen such works
are: ‘thy’, ‘mayst’, ‘linger’, ‘fear’, ‘death’, ‘trembling hope’, ‘skeleton’,
‘time’, oblivion’, ‘sleep’, blessed’, ‘repose’, ‘deathless’, ,awful’ etc.
Rhyme
and Rhythm:-
The poem is divided into five stanzas
each made of 11 lines. The rhyme scheme is : abba cdcd eee. This is a new
scheme. It seems she has experimented, even thought it is so, it is worthy. The
sound system creates a very line rhythm through consonance and assonance. Look
this following phrase how sweet they are: “winding round and round” , “bird and
bee”, “with one sweet song”, “wide open thrown open”, “my eyes delighted”,
“tree be ever dear”, “unknown yet well known”.
Inner rhyming word, ending rhyme,
eye-rhyme, pair word etc. really make the poem musical.
Most of the critics agree that “in the
organization of poem as a whole and in the finish of individual stanza, in its
mastery of phrase and rhythm, in its music of sound and ideas: “our Casuarina
Tree” is a superb piece of writing and gives us a taste of what Toru might have
done had not the race of her life been so quickly run.”
Critically evaluate sonnet – ‘Baugmaree
The Title; the Garden:-
The title is very suggestive and apt.
The garden ‘Baugmaree’ is the main subject of the poem. The poet describes
scenic beauty of the garden of her family. It shows her love for nature.
Critically evaluate sonnet – ‘The Lotus’
Critically evaluate sonnet – ‘The Lotus’She belonged to wealthy and educated
family. Her parents were literary personalities. She was fragile but powerful
in sensitivity. Life was as she saw a few deaths. In a very short life she left
behind a rich tradition. Her Education in Bengal,
England and France has
helped a lot to her poetic career.
“A Sheaf Gleaned in French” is a collection of translations. Her creative poetic collection is “Ancient Ballads and Legends of Hindustan” published in 1882. “Miscellaneous Poems” is another collection. She wrote short lyrics, odes and sonnets in which her talent is seen.
“A Sheaf Gleaned in French” is a collection of translations. Her creative poetic collection is “Ancient Ballads and Legends of Hindustan” published in 1882. “Miscellaneous Poems” is another collection. She wrote short lyrics, odes and sonnets in which her talent is seen.
Basically she is a romantic poet. Her
description of nature is very fine and fascinating. There is moral tone but it
is saved because of her lyrical output. Her sensitive, intense nature adds
charm. Sincerity of mind; finely knit content; vigorous, pleasing sound’ and
sense make her word value. Nostalgic mood,, variety of description, dialogues
etc. rise to the occasion and she manages to versification. ‘Lotus, ‘Prahalad’,
‘Savitri’, ‘Our Casuarina Tree’ and ‘Baugmaree are some of her beautiful
poems.
The Lotus:-
The poem tells us the story of the
birth of the lotus flower. There was a conflict between the Lily and the Rose
about their claim of the Queen. Psyche (love) goes to Flora (the Queen of
Gardens) to fins the answer. Psyche asks such a flower that should be delicious
as the rose and stately as the lily. The combination of both these things is
the lotus. She gives Psyche this flower which is rose-red and lily-white. Even
the strife between the two is known to other flowers. Often they talked about
this as this was a quarrel since long long time. Even the praises of each were
sung by the poets but there was no solution. Some claimed that Rose can not
tower like Lily. Lily hides beauty of Rose. Lily’s appearance is majestic. The
look is fascinating. But rival is also beautiful. Out of two certainly rose is
lovelier. Rose is delicious and Lily is stately. Rose is soft, Lily is proud.
There was no end of this dispute.
Lotus’s demand to solve the problem:-
Love was confused. She wanted peace in
the garden. As the rivals were constantly quarreling it was better to find some
solution. At last Love went to Flora. She put the trouble before. She demanded
delicacy of rose and stateliness of lily. But there was the problem of colour.
Flora asked her of a particular colour. This troubled her more. First she chose
red. Then she withdrew it and thought another option. She pointed lily-white
colour. But soon she found trapped. As there was no way she placed third option
- combination of these both colors. Finally Flora saved the riddle. She made a
new flower. It was lotus. She gave it her. The lotus had both the qualities. It
was rose red and lily white as well as stately and beautiful. It became
queenliest of all flowers.
Greek myths:-
Love and Flora both are related to
Greek and Roman myths. In Latin mythology love is Cupid. He is the son of
goddess Venus. He was beautiful. He loved a beautiful maiden Psyche. She too
returned his love as well King of gods Jupiter brings union for both of them.
Flora in Roman mythology is Goddess of
Flowers and springtime. She is a beautiful maiden. She wears a crown of
flowers.
In Greek mythology there are lotus
eaters. The people who ate the fruit of lotus tree forget their friends and
homes. They also lost desire to return to their native and but this has nothing
to do with our poem.
Description of nature & Natural aspects:-
Toru is a poet of nature. This poem reveals
her “keen sensitiveness to nature and the responsiveness of her soul to
colour”. She notices flowers minutely. Her imagination is supreme. Qualities of
rose and lily have been brought out. Garden, flower colours make a link. It
gives any reader a joy to be in touch with the following lines are described
well.
“Give me a flower delicious as the
rose
And stately as the lily in her pride.”
“The rose can never tower,
Like the pale lily with her pride.”
The
solution is still more beautiful.
“And Flora gave the lotus, “rose red”
dyed
And “lily-white”, queenliest flower
that blows”.
Personification:-
Love is personified. The myth of Love
is taken here. Even Flora is the same. They are known to us. The influence of
Greek and Roman literature is seen on many poets. But the rose and the lily are
personified as well. But these are women and as women they are conscious of
beauty so are these flowers. Human quality of becoming superior to other is
noticeable. Both of them are fighting for supreme title of Queen. They have
their factions too. This is an excellent example Toru’s wonderful imagination.
Similes and Metaphor:-
The description has become colourful
and vivid as similes and metaphors have been used. “Rose can never tower like
pale lily” is one simile. Another is “a flower delicious as the rose”. The
third is “stately as the lily.”
Lotus is considered “queenliest” of
flower. The flowers are “rivals”. They think of ‘high honour’. One can not
tower’ the other. Thus these words indicate metaphor of flowers.
Dialogues and Description:-
The poet has used both these
techniques. She begins with description. Love goes to Flora. The poet describes
first the ‘problems’ and the same is told to Flora in the dialogues. They are
short and pointed. Clear, cut demands and solutions have been sought out. Short
dialogues of love show her curiosity and impatient mind. She fumbles in the
choice if beautiful shown through affirmation and negation. The used of hyphen
tells this all. Notice the dialogue.
“But of what colour? – “Rose-Red” love
first chose,
Then
prayed, - “No, lily-white, - or, both provide”.
In the ends the poet describes the
solution. Thus she follows a scientific method: first problem then solution-
then better options and finally the solution.
Simplicity of diction:-
The diction of the poem is very
simple. Straight forward matter has been put. Looking the following lines.
1. Love came to Flora.
2. The rose can never tower.
3. Give me a flower.
4. And Flora gave the lotus.
5. But is the lily lovelier?
6. Then prayed
7. Love first chose etc.
This shows the poet’s style. But she avoids prosaic
quality. This simplicity becomes a virtue. It shows her natural output the
phrases put together make them poetic. The clauses used with them add charm e.g.
“Love came to Flora asking for a flower
That would be of flowers be undisputed queen.”
“The rose can never tower
Like
the pale lily.”
Use of adjective is remarkable.
Instead of saying red like rose she puts rose red and the same for
“lily-white”. Instead of saying “provide both”. The description is ‘both
provide’. Because of such small things diction is remarkable.
Sound system:-
Repetition is one system to create
music in the following lines.
“Love came to Flora asking for a
flower”. (/f/, /l/ and /r/ sound).
“But is the lily lovelier?”
(Combination of /i/ sound)
In pairs many words sound is beautiful
e.g.
“Flower faction’, ‘pale lily’, ‘rose
red’, ‘their claims’.
Repetition lf some words like ‘long’,
‘flower’, and ‘rose’, ‘lily’ not only continue to remind the content matter but
also strengthen it. These all sorts of sounds make the poem sweet.
Rhyme Scheme:-
The poem follows a rhyme scheme of
‘abba abba cd cd’. Toru is trying to follows Italian rhyme scheme’. At the end
it breaks but in the earlier part the scheme runs well.
This is an example of what the poet
did at the early age. A poetic beauty is notable.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)